• Print
close

Just another TPA error

dfdfasdfasd

Retirement plans with more than 100 participants require a CPA audit for their Form 5500. However, small plans with less than 100 participants may sometimes require an audit. This often happens when more than 5% of the Plan’s assets are invested in what is called non-qualified assets and a fidelity bond wasn’t purchased in the amount of the non-qualified assets.

 

For many years, a certain client held a partnership interest in a privately held real estate partnership that exceeded 5% of assets and was considered non-qualified according to the Department of Labor’s guidance. The previous third-party administration firm (TPA) never raised the issue of the 95% rule, even though it’s been around for years. Of course, this issue only pops up after they make the transition to a new TPA. The new TPA tells the client they need an audit for $10,000 and the audit should have been done for years.

 

If this client never changed TPAs, would they have ever noticed this error? Of course not, because the lousy TPAs out there have no checks and balances to ensure proper administration. The good TPAs have a system of checks and balances where work is reviewed, checked, and checked again.

 

I hate to shill, but I stress the need for an independent ERISA attorney who can discover these errors. A review of Form 5500 and a plan asset schedule would have easily uncovered this.

 

As stated before, my Retirement Plan Tune-Up is a legal review that looks at the plan documents, administration, testing, Form 5500, and the investment policy statement for a flat fee of $750.

 

Story Page
%d bloggers like this: